US Vice President JD Vance has openly aligned himself with Elon Musk’s AI platform Grok, calling it the “least woke” artificial intelligence system available today. The remarks came during a conversation with Fox News host Sean Hannity, where the pair discussed their growing interest in AI tools and Musk’s increasingly influential role in the tech landscape.

What JD Vance said about Grok and AI bias

During the interview, Hannity asked Vance whether he was “obsessed” with AI. Vance admitted he was, prompting the host to refer to himself as a “Grok guy.” Vance quickly echoed the sentiment, saying, “Okay, me too. I’m a Grok guy.”

Vance said his standard for assessing any AI system comes down to whether it provides what he calls an objective answer rather than a “woke answer.” He praised Grok for meeting that threshold, adding, “I think it’s the best. It’s also the least woke.”

The vice president’s comments reflect a broader debate around perceived political bias in artificial intelligence, an issue that has fueled discussions across tech companies, policymakers, and online communities. This section could link internally to an explainer on how AI models are trained and why bias debates persist.

Hannity’s “extreme mode” joke and Vance’s response

The segment took a lighter turn when Hannity asked Vance whether he had tried Grok’s most notorious setting: “extreme mode.” Vance laughed off the suggestion and said he had intentionally avoided it to steer clear of media criticism.

Grok’s more unrestrained features have become a talking point since Musk’s AI firm xAI introduced an “Unhinged” mode for Grok 3 earlier in 2025. The option, positioned as a deliberately unfiltered creative setting, is restricted to premium subscribers.

How Elon Musk reacted to the exchange

Shortly after the interview aired, Musk shared a clip of the Hannity-Vance conversation on X, adding the caption, “Grok rocks!” The endorsement continues Musk’s public effort to present Grok as a more rebellious alternative to mainstream AI platforms.

Musk has framed Grok as intentionally nonconformist, often casting other AI systems as overly sanitized or politically filtered. His responses tend to energize Grok’s online fanbase, which frequently amplifies features like “extreme” or “unhinged” modes.

Vance’s previous praise for Grok and its role in his personal life

The vice president has publicly praised Grok before. In a podcast conversation with former Musk aide Katie Miller, Vance recounted using the AI to generate images for a picture book he created with his children. He explained that they wrote the text themselves but turned to Grok to design visuals for a “big cats” story.

The anecdote highlights a growing trend: politicians and public divs adopting consumer AI tools not just for professional tasks but personal creative projects as well.

Why Grok 3 has been at the center of political attention

Grok 3 earlier made headlines in February when a user asked it to list the “three people doing most harm to America.” The model’s response—naming Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and JD Vance—immediately sparked conversation about how even a self-described “anti-woke” AI can produce unexpected or provocative outputs.

This moment underscores the unpredictability of large language models and the ongoing public scrutiny around their training, guardrails, and political impact. An internal link could be added here to a deeper dive on how AI systems generate controversial responses.

The political significance of Vance’s comments

Vance’s statement that Grok is the “least woke” AI taps into a broader political narrative that frames some AI platforms as overly moderated or ideologically filtered. By endorsing Grok, Vance aligns himself with Musk’s vision for what AI should be: less constrained, more irreverent, and positioned as a counterweight to mainstream technology companies.

His comments also reflect the increasing presence of AI in political discourse as candidates and public officials debate how artificial intelligence should be regulated, used, or restricted. As the 2020s progress, digital tools are becoming central not just to innovation but to cultural and ideological battles.